Wednesday, May 6, 2026
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
Advertisement
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
No Result
View All Result
Home Judiciary

Alleged ₦110.4bn Kogi Fraud: Court admits High Court judgment as evidence 

Deji Akintola by Deji Akintola
May 6, 2026
in Judiciary
0
Alleged ₦110.4bn Kogi Fraud: Court admits High Court judgment as evidence 
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Justice Maryanne Anineh of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Maitama, Abuja on Tuesday, May 5, 2026 admitted into evidence a judgment of the FCT High Court against the former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Bello alongside Umar Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu on an alleged 16-count charge bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering to the tune of ₦110.4 billion.

At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, prosecution counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, informed the court that he was concluding the examination-in-chief of the witness, PW14, Nicholas Okehone, an Internal auditor of the American International School, Abuja.

“My lord, on the last adjourned date, I was examining PW14 and I was about rounding up. The witness is here; I can finish so that we can take cross-examination,” he said.

He also urged the court to defer pending applications, including one challenging jurisdiction, in order to allow the trial to proceed without interruption.

During his testimony, Okehone confirmed his awareness of a suit filed by Ali Bello against the American International School and the judgment delivered in the matter.

The prosecution subsequently sought to tender the Certified True Copy of the judgment in Suit No. FCT/ST/CB/6574/2023, as well as a payment receipt.Counsel to the defendants, J.B. Daudu, SAN, and Z.E. Abbas, raised no objection to the admissibility of the documents.

Justice Anineh thereafter admitted them in evidence and marked them as Exhibits AY and AY2, respectively.Led in evidence, the witness confirmed that Ali Bello was the claimant in the suit and identified as the father of a prospective student, Zayyan Ali Bello.

He, however, clarified that Ali Bello was not the father of four other children referenced in the documents.

According to him, “from our record, Yahaya Adoza Bello is the father of the four children.”

Reading from the admitted judgment, the witness disclosed that arrangements were made for the payment of the children’s school fees up to graduation through an upfront payment plan.

He further stated that “the sum of $569,864.12 was paid into the account of the school domiciled in TD Bank,” adding that receipts were issued for the transactions and that the amount formed part of the total payment made.

Under cross-examination, defence counsel, Daudu, SAN, confirmed from the witness that the American International School is located in the Durumi District of Abuja and that the witness had served as an internal auditor of the school for about eight to nine years.

The witness also told the court that his role did not permit him to interface with students and confirmed that he did not represent the school in the suit which judgment was tendered in evidence.

Following cross-examination by both defence teams and in the absence of re-examination, the witness was discharged.

Thereafter, the prosecution moved an application dated October 7, 2025, seeking to stay or suspend the hearing of the first defendant’s motion challenging the jurisdiction of the court.

Arguing the application, Pinheiro relied on provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, ACJA, emphasizing the need for speedy and uninterrupted trial.


“My lord, essentially, this application seeks to suspend the hearing of the first defendant’s motion. I urge my lordship to deliver ruling and judgment on the trial,” he said.

Citing Sections 111, 221 and 396(2) and (3) of the ACJA, he argued that criminal trials should not be stalled by interlocutory objections.


“A community reading of these Sections makes it unambiguous that no criminal trial shall be interrupted by any form of objection,” he said.


Previous Post

Police arrest 6 notorious kidnappers, rescue victims in Kaduna

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

https://youtu.be/FHyJ1Wr0FAk?si=0WVYI_2OR4OrIrQ4
https://youtu.be/gbE3azm_Io0?si=GdE3Mqelo1ujTNla
Alleged ₦110.4bn Kogi Fraud: Court admits High Court judgment as evidence 
Judiciary

Alleged ₦110.4bn Kogi Fraud: Court admits High Court judgment as evidence 

by Deji Akintola
May 6, 2026
0

Justice Maryanne Anineh of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Maitama, Abuja on Tuesday, May 5, 2026 admitted into...

Read moreDetails
Police arrest abductors of Bayelsa Judge

Police arrest 6 notorious kidnappers, rescue victims in Kaduna

May 6, 2026
Troops eliminate notorious bandit leader ‘Dan Dari Biyar’ in Sokoto

Troops nab terrorists, informant, drug peddlers

May 6, 2026
SERAP seeks court order to compel CBN disclose LGA fund details

SERAP rejects Abuja court judgment in DSS defamation case

May 6, 2026
IGP announces key reforms

IGP announces key reforms

May 6, 2026
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepage

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng