Friday, June 26, 2026
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
Advertisement
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
No Result
View All Result
Home Cover

Gov/HA Elections: Parties, candidates go to ‘war’ Saturday

Eze Chidozie by Eze Chidozie
March 17, 2023
in Cover
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

*Adopt dirty tricks, blackmail in desperate move to win

With the violation of sections of the Electoral Act and Manual for the conduct of the 25thd February Presidential and National Assembly poll by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the nation’s political gladiators now see Saturday’s Governorship and State House of Assembly election as a “do-or-die affair”. 

Consequently, political parties an ky,an  d their candidates are deploying many tricks and even plotting to deploy mayhem and all forms of electoral malpractices to ensure they not only retain seats already won by their parties, but snatch results from their opponents at all costs. 

For the major political parties and their candidates, tomorrow’s elections present good opportunities to make further political statements.

The hitherto not too strong political parties which made beautiful inroads in the last election, are equally building up their “arsenal” to wedge the “war” against the hegemonic political rulers they had described as “highly corrupt and incompetent”.

Following the general criticisms that greeted the presidential election, with all the political parties, except the ruling All Progressives Congress insisting that the presidential and National Assembly elections were not free, fair and credible and that the results declared by the INEC did not reflect the actual votes garnered by them.

The main opposition parties such as Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the Labour Party (LP) and the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) have condemned the outcome of the elections, especially the pronouncement of Asiwaju Ahmed Bola Tinubu as President-elect. While the PDP and the LP have already gone to court to challenge the outcome with each claiming to have won the election, the NNPP so far stopped at denouncing the election results.

The victorious All Progressive Congress (APC) has however dismissed the position of the other key opposition parties as bad losers. Even at that, there were pains inflicted on the APC as a ruling party and its presidential candidate, by the opposition insisting they rigged the election in liaison with the INEC, inspite of losing Lagos, Osun and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to a relatively unknown LP.

Lagos and Osun states are considered traditional victorious states to Tinubu and his APC. 

Tinubu ruled Lagos for eight years as a two-term Governor between 1999 and 2007 and his politocal allies have retained power in Lagos up till now.

It is believed in political circles that Tinubu’s victory on February 25 would be incomplete if APC loses Lagos state at tomorrow’s election. 

Apart from being the richest state in Nigeria, it is strategic for Tinubu to maintain the firm grip he has held over Lagos politics and economy since 1999.

For the PDP and the LP, a resounding victory in tomorrow’s election would be the best evidence to present to the world that the last presidential election was manipulated; and who knows, it might be of great support to their legal battle to upturn the final verdict of the presidential election in their favour or have a re-run in some places considered too violent during the poll.

Meanwhile, reports from across Nigeria indicate that politicians and their parties were doing everything possible, including engaging in the absurd to win. 

Their desperation was said to have been buoyed by the sad reality that whoever is declared winner in an election by INEC hardly gets removed by the election tribunals.

In Lagos, there have been loud cries that voters were allegedly being intimidated and beaten up to vote for the APC to ensure that Tinubu is not defeated again like in the presidential election.

In Enugu state where the LP’s “Obidient Movement” is the rave of the moment, other parties were devising means of tapping from the good will of the phrase “Obidients”.

A support group for the PDP governorship candidate, Mr. Peter Mba, has been laying claim to LP’s “Obidient Movement” already endorsing the candidate, insisting that LP’s candidate, Chijioke Edeoga, is on his own, having been abandoned by the “Obidient Movement”. 
According to news reports, a  new socio  political pressure group in the South-East zone of the country, the “Obedient Family”, is being claimed as the back bone of all the political parties, seen as mechanism to define and determine the “character, competence and capacity” of each of the political actors, seeking to be entrusted with the mandate of the electorates in  the next political dispensation.

The general feeling in the geo-political zone is that politicians with “character, capacity and competence” are the only ones required to hold any political office, as they lament lack of public, especially Federal infrastructure in the zone and cries of absolute marginalisation.

In Enugu Thursday, different politocal groups during their campaigns lay claim to Mr. Obi endorsing their candidate, even against LP candidates, which forced Mr. Obi himself to dismiss such claims in an interview on Channels Television Morning Show, saying he supports all LP candidates, because they emerged through credible, peaceful and verifiable primary.

“I am but only a member of the Labour Party. The party is bigger than me. I support all our candidates across the country and I urge Nigerians to vote for them.

“I however note that the Obidients are far more than me and any political party. They are people who are disenchanted with the criminality going on in the country in terms of leadership and who desperately desire a change so our country can move from consumption to production and thereby move our economy forward. 

“They can decide to support any candidate they feel has capacity and character and in that regard there is nothing I can do,” Obi stated.

Leader of one of the Obidient groups, Prof. Mike Okwudili, said in Enugu that although they are non-political group, but found it worthy to canvass and convince the electorates not to vote along party line, but to vote for candidates based on their antecedents with proven record of integrity and competence.

He said that Peter Mbah, the PDP governorship candidate possesses the above defined features more than every other candidate in the Enugu state 2023 governorship election. 

He explained that though the Obidients are the bullwalk behind Mr Peter Obi, the Labour party presidential candidate, but it did not end with the  conduct of the Presidential and National elections.

 In Lagos, Kano, Kaduna, Adamawa, Kano, Osun, Ekiti, Abia, Anambra, Rivers, Ebonyi, Cross-River, Katsina, Ekiti and Bayelsa States, tension have reached feverish crescendo, with political actors, plotting how to undo one another, rather than appeal to the electorates for votes.

In Lagos, Anambra and Rivers particularly, supporters of the opposition party candidates are being intimidated and harmed, by urchins sponsored by the ruling party in those states, to attack the strong hold of their opponents, and whisk away the electoral materials and officlas to unknown places.

Few days to the poll, evidence of such acts of brigandage have been witnessed in those states with attacks on the campaign train of political opponents.

These attacks are givem vent by the lethargy or collusion of security agencies in such despicable act.

According to Mr. Mike Igini, former Resident Electoral Commissioner in INEC, speaking on AIT Governorship/State Assembly Election: Issues and Analysis programme, Friday, “that we are aware that politicians plot to shoot their way to the polling stations, abduct poll officials and take away balloting materials and get to another place, destroy already thump printed ballot papers and thump print new ones, not above the already accredited by BVAS, and write results and ask their opponents to go to court.

“However, they will fail as there are already mechanisms put in place to frustrate that effort which I am not going to disclose now”.

Saturday’s election therefore promises to be a make or maar contest, which if the INEC fails to change their pattern and position, is likely to lead to political upheavals in the country.

Except the security agencies wake up to their responsibilities, the country is likely to descend to the political nadir, but analysists say, the successful arrest of some of the hoodlums and recovery of their arms, provides a scinctila of hope that the election would turn out to be free, fair and credible.

While INEC’s National Commissioner/Chairman, Voter Education and Publicity, Barr. Festus Okoye, states unequivocally that the commission is poised to deliver credible election, members of the public hardly believe him, saying the February 25th poll was a huge disappointment, making them to take INEC assurances with a punch of salt.

Previous Post

Nigeria’s inflation hits 21.9% in Feb, 2023 – NBS 

Next Post

NJC recommends compulsory retirement of Taraba Chief Judge

Next Post

NJC recommends compulsory retirement of Taraba Chief Judge

https://youtu.be/FHyJ1Wr0FAk?si=0WVYI_2OR4OrIrQ4
https://youtu.be/gbE3azm_Io0?si=GdE3Mqelo1ujTNla
Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  
Opinion

Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  

by Newsdesk Africa
June 26, 2026
0

By Sheriff. C. ADELE, Esq  On June 23, 2026, the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC), at its 173rd General Meeting, approved the suspension of Chief Mike Ozekhome from the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). The suspension, announced pursuant to Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria, is to remain in force pending the final determination of disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee.   While the LPPC asserts that the suspension is intended to "safeguard the integrity, dignity and prestige of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria", this decision raises profound concerns about procedural propriety, jurisdictional overreach, and the prejudicial effect it portends for both the legal profession and the administration of justice. This article critically examines the hasty decision of the LPPC, its implications, and why it constitutes a premature verdict that undermines the very principles of natural justice the legal profession is sworn to uphold.  Chief Mike Ozekhome, a prominent constitutional lawyer and human rights advocate, is currently facing disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee. The proceedings relate to his involvement in a controversial property dispute in the United Kingdom concerning a property located at 79 Randall Avenue, London. Chief Ozekhome is also standing trial before an FCT High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on a 12-count charge, to which he has pleaded not guilty.  What is particularly significant and troubling is that the same issues before the LPPC are also pending before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC), the body statutorily charged with the responsibility of sanctioning legal practitioners for professional misconduct. The LPDC is yet to make any determination on the substantive allegations against chief Ozekhome. Yet, the LPPC has proceeded to impose a suspension that, in practical effect, constitutes a pre-determinative sanction.  The Distinct Jurisdictions of the LPPC and LPDC  To appreciate the gravity of the LPPC’s decision, it is essential to understand the distinct and separate roles of the LPPC and the LPDC under Nigerian law.  The LPPC is a statutory body established under Section 5 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its primary function is to consider and determine eligible applicants for the conferment of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. Chaired by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the LPPC is also empowered to make rules as to the privileges to be accorded to Senior Advocates of Nigeria. While the LPPC has disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers are ancillary to its primary function of conferring and regulating the rank. The LPPC's disciplinary authority is derived from its guidelines, including Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. However, this authority is limited to matters pertaining to the rank itself and the privileges associated with it.  The LPDC, by contrast, is a committee of the Body of Benchers established under Section 10 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its mandate is far broader and more fundamental: it is the primary disciplinary body for all legal practitioners in Nigeria. The LPDC exercises jurisdiction over all lawyers called to the Nigerian Bar and is empowered to investigate allegations of professional misconduct and impose sanctions ranging from admonition to suspension and disbarment.  The Critical Distinction  The distinction between these two bodies is not merely academic, it is fundamental to the proper administration of justice in the legal profession. The LPPC is primarily a conferring and privilege-regulating body. The LPDC is the disciplinary body par excellence. While the LPPC may have incidental disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers cannot supplant or pre-empt the primary disciplinary jurisdiction of the LPDC.  When the same issues are pending before both bodies, as they are in chief Ozekhome’s case, the LPDC’s determination on professional misconduct must logically precede any disciplinary sanction from the LPPC. The LPPC cannot independently determine facts of professional misconduct that are the exclusive province of the LPDC.  The Hasty Decision: A Premature Verdict  The LPPC’s decision to suspend chief Ozekhome from the rank of SAN pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings is, with respect, a hasty and premature verdict that suffers from several fundamental flaws.  Procedural Impropriety ...

Read moreDetails
TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

June 26, 2026
Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

June 25, 2026
Charge or Release El-Rufai now Group charges FG, calls on opposition leaders to speak out

ICPC arraigns el-Rufai, ex-aide over alleged N8.68bn CCTV contract fraud in Kaduna

June 25, 2026
Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

June 25, 2026
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepage

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng