Saturday, June 27, 2026
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
Advertisement
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

Power to the powerless people; Structure to the structureless party!

Ben Agbo Rev. Fr. by Ben Agbo Rev. Fr.
March 10, 2023
in Opinion
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Preamble
The Nigerian people became powerless over the years. They lost the power to elect its rulers. Democracy became a mirage or a farce, to say the least. It metamorphosed into plutocracy – government of the party, by the party and for the party. Primary election became primary selection where “O jebego” became the campaign mantra of some parties. Political offices began to go to the highest bidders. The rich became richer while the poor became poorer. Poverty became weaponized as the people were strategically rendered hungry and poor so that when they see crumbs falling from the table of the Politicians they begin to sing “Hosanna to the son of David”.

Basic amenities like good schools, good roads, rural electrification, pipe borne water, etc became rare commodities while political appointments (some lasting less than 6 months) became modus operandi for sharing democratic dividends. They called it “nrashi” in my state. Some others called it by its real name – “poverty alleviation”. Salaries and pensions became privileges rather than the rights of workers and even peaceful demonstration/strike action became anatemized. All that became conventional was to organize a group and go to Government house and be rewarded in high currency. All these instigated the people’s angst and gave rise to a new revolution in Nigeria known as the OBIdient movement. This movement led temporarily by Mr Peter Obi has come in 3 phases.

Phase One: Restoring Power to the People
The #Endsars gave the first signals of this revolution but it was nipped in the bud due to some unwholesome motives behind its organizers. But the New Electoral Act gave the second signals of hope for this revolution. It came from the Politicians themselves with an intention just to checkmate themselves from electoral malpractice. But the Nigerian Youths suddenly took interest in this electoral act especially with the introduction of the BVAS for accreditation and uploading of results and waited patiently to see it test runned at Anambra and Osun election. When Nigerian Youths spontaneously found themselves at WADATA PLAZA beconing on the PDP to give them Obi shortly before the 2022 Primary election, little did anybody see this as the last warning bell. The Youths suddenly heard Obi’s message and decided to take back their Country during the just concluded 25th February Presidential Election. Everybody decided to be OBIdient, went out to get their PVCs and made a lot of noise in the Social Media. The Politicians took them for a ride believing that the OBIdient movement had no structures until the structureless party struck on that fateful day and succeeded in retiring many old Politicians and sending shocking waves on the rest of the naysayers among them.

Phase Two: Giving structure to the structureless party
Labour Party suddenly became more than a third force. It became a people’s force. But some corrupt Politicians dared the people, as expected, and stole their votes. Some came surreptitiously while we were sleeping politically and “buggled” the INEC office through a number of shoddy deals. Some came like thugs during election and scattered the ballot boxes. Some resorted to lobbying the people for their votes, bribing the returning officers, INEC REC Chairmen and the rest.

Now the Nigerian Youths are regrouping for a repeat match on 11th March (now postponed until 18th March). They are still angry because their Principal, Obi was robbed of his mandate. But he has told them not to worry but just to help him give his party (the Labour Party) some State strongholds. They are more determined now to vote and defend their votes both at the polling units and beyond that. This is making some parties jittery. Everybody is now claiming to be OBIdient, even those who previously derided the Labour Party as a “structureless party”. Some have resorted to violence – killing some of the Labour Party Candidates. Some have ran to the Churches wanting the bishops and priests to anoint them as leaders of the structureless people they previously derided. Some have gone to the media to play both ethnic and religious/denominational cards tying to confuse the gullible church members.

Phase Three: Good Governance to the People
The end point of all these will be the arrival of good governance for the people if the OBIdient Movement finally succeeds. Even those who have been temporarily favoured will soon be asked for their VERIFICATION OF GOOD GOVERNANCE CERTIFICATE or they will be shown the exit door by the next four years. Anybody who doesn’t speak the new language: GO AND VERIFY will surely be disgraced out of office and shown the way home.

The truth is that this movement is beyond any party, religious or denominational provenances. Peter Obi may need us to vote for Labour Party just for now so that his followers may have a political foothold. But sooner or later, the movement will be devoid of any party identity. Let’s be patient and watch this movement unfold. Stop trying to pitch yourself against its momentum no matter who you think you are! The OBIdient movement is a Divine force. It is prayer for Nigeria in distress answered!

Previous Post

Afenifere rejects Tinubu, insists Peter Obi won lawful votes

Next Post

Why I sought kidney donor outside my family – Ekweremadu

Next Post

Why I sought kidney donor outside my family – Ekweremadu

https://youtu.be/FHyJ1Wr0FAk?si=0WVYI_2OR4OrIrQ4
https://youtu.be/gbE3azm_Io0?si=GdE3Mqelo1ujTNla
Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  
Opinion

Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  

by Newsdesk Africa
June 26, 2026
0

By Sheriff. C. ADELE, Esq  On June 23, 2026, the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC), at its 173rd General Meeting, approved the suspension of Chief Mike Ozekhome from the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). The suspension, announced pursuant to Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria, is to remain in force pending the final determination of disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee.   While the LPPC asserts that the suspension is intended to "safeguard the integrity, dignity and prestige of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria", this decision raises profound concerns about procedural propriety, jurisdictional overreach, and the prejudicial effect it portends for both the legal profession and the administration of justice. This article critically examines the hasty decision of the LPPC, its implications, and why it constitutes a premature verdict that undermines the very principles of natural justice the legal profession is sworn to uphold.  Chief Mike Ozekhome, a prominent constitutional lawyer and human rights advocate, is currently facing disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee. The proceedings relate to his involvement in a controversial property dispute in the United Kingdom concerning a property located at 79 Randall Avenue, London. Chief Ozekhome is also standing trial before an FCT High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on a 12-count charge, to which he has pleaded not guilty.  What is particularly significant and troubling is that the same issues before the LPPC are also pending before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC), the body statutorily charged with the responsibility of sanctioning legal practitioners for professional misconduct. The LPDC is yet to make any determination on the substantive allegations against chief Ozekhome. Yet, the LPPC has proceeded to impose a suspension that, in practical effect, constitutes a pre-determinative sanction.  The Distinct Jurisdictions of the LPPC and LPDC  To appreciate the gravity of the LPPC’s decision, it is essential to understand the distinct and separate roles of the LPPC and the LPDC under Nigerian law.  The LPPC is a statutory body established under Section 5 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its primary function is to consider and determine eligible applicants for the conferment of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. Chaired by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the LPPC is also empowered to make rules as to the privileges to be accorded to Senior Advocates of Nigeria. While the LPPC has disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers are ancillary to its primary function of conferring and regulating the rank. The LPPC's disciplinary authority is derived from its guidelines, including Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. However, this authority is limited to matters pertaining to the rank itself and the privileges associated with it.  The LPDC, by contrast, is a committee of the Body of Benchers established under Section 10 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its mandate is far broader and more fundamental: it is the primary disciplinary body for all legal practitioners in Nigeria. The LPDC exercises jurisdiction over all lawyers called to the Nigerian Bar and is empowered to investigate allegations of professional misconduct and impose sanctions ranging from admonition to suspension and disbarment.  The Critical Distinction  The distinction between these two bodies is not merely academic, it is fundamental to the proper administration of justice in the legal profession. The LPPC is primarily a conferring and privilege-regulating body. The LPDC is the disciplinary body par excellence. While the LPPC may have incidental disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers cannot supplant or pre-empt the primary disciplinary jurisdiction of the LPDC.  When the same issues are pending before both bodies, as they are in chief Ozekhome’s case, the LPDC’s determination on professional misconduct must logically precede any disciplinary sanction from the LPPC. The LPPC cannot independently determine facts of professional misconduct that are the exclusive province of the LPDC.  The Hasty Decision: A Premature Verdict  The LPPC’s decision to suspend chief Ozekhome from the rank of SAN pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings is, with respect, a hasty and premature verdict that suffers from several fundamental flaws.  Procedural Impropriety ...

Read moreDetails
TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

June 26, 2026
Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

June 25, 2026
Charge or Release El-Rufai now Group charges FG, calls on opposition leaders to speak out

ICPC arraigns el-Rufai, ex-aide over alleged N8.68bn CCTV contract fraud in Kaduna

June 25, 2026
Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

June 25, 2026
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepage

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng