Friday, June 26, 2026
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
Advertisement
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Part of Reuters report on “Nigerian military’s secret abortion” which Army denies

Our Reporters by Our Reporters
December 9, 2022
in News
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Since at least 2013, according to the disputed Reuter report, the Nigerian Army has run a secret, systematic and illegal abortion programme in the country’s northeast, terminating at least 10,000 pregnancies among women and girls, many of whom had been kidnapped and raped by Islamist militants, Reuters reported on Wednesday.

The abortions mostly were carried out without the women’s consent – and often without their prior knowledge, according to witness accounts. 

The women and girls ranged from a few weeks to eight months pregnant, and some were as young as 12 years old.

The investigation is based on interviews with 33 women and girls who say they underwent abortions while in the custody of the Nigerian Army.

Reporters also interviewed five civilian healthcare workers and nine security personnel involved in the programme, including soldiers and others such as armed guards engaged in escorting pregnant women to abortion sites.

In addition, Reuters reviewed copies of military documents and civilian hospital records describing or tallying thousands of abortions.

Nigerian military officials denied the existence of the abortion programme, saying it would be impossible to hide such abuses from the multitude of international and local aid groups engaged in humanitarian efforts in the region.

“Everybody has free access to what we’re doing,” said Major General Christopher Musa, who heads the counter-insurgency campaign in the northeast. 

“Nobody has ever accused us of any of this. We have not done it. We will not do it. It is not in our character,” he insisted.

The Nigerian military has been engaged in a war with Islamist militants in the northeast of the country for the past 13 years. 

At least 300,000 people have died in the conflict, some due to violence, many more from starvation and disease, according to the United Nations and human rights groups.

Key findings of the investigation:

* The campaign relied on deception and physical force against women and girls who were kept in military custody for days or weeks. Women, often debilitated from captivity in the bush, were sometimes told that pills and injections given to them were to restore or protect their health. 

In some instances, women who resisted were beaten, caned, held at gunpoint or drugged into compliance.

* The army-run abortion programme has been in place since at least 2013, and procedures were being performed through at least November of last year, according to accounts from soldiers. 

The enterprise has been elaborately engineered, the sources told Reuters, with pregnant former captives of insurgents transported regularly in trucks under armed guard, sometimes in convoys, to barracks or hospitals across the northeast for abortions.

* The procedures have occurred in at least five military facilities and five civilian hospitals in the northeast of Nigeria, according to witness accounts and documentation reviewed by Reuters.

*At military facilities and in the field, some abortions proved fatal. Although Reuters could not determine the number of deaths in nearly 10 years of the programme, four soldiers and two security officers said they witnessed women die from abortions, or saw their corpses afterward.

*International legal experts say forced abortions may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity. Although forced abortions are not specifically criminalised under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, experts said, they could be construed as torture or other inhumane treatment and be prosecuted as such. 

Previous Post

Afenifere leading Obi’s campaign shows God has taken charge of Nigeria – Ohanaeze

Next Post

BVAS: INEC knocks Tinubu

Next Post

BVAS: INEC knocks Tinubu

https://youtu.be/FHyJ1Wr0FAk?si=0WVYI_2OR4OrIrQ4
https://youtu.be/gbE3azm_Io0?si=GdE3Mqelo1ujTNla
Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  
Opinion

Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  

by Newsdesk Africa
June 26, 2026
0

By Sheriff. C. ADELE, Esq  On June 23, 2026, the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC), at its 173rd General Meeting, approved the suspension of Chief Mike Ozekhome from the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). The suspension, announced pursuant to Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria, is to remain in force pending the final determination of disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee.   While the LPPC asserts that the suspension is intended to "safeguard the integrity, dignity and prestige of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria", this decision raises profound concerns about procedural propriety, jurisdictional overreach, and the prejudicial effect it portends for both the legal profession and the administration of justice. This article critically examines the hasty decision of the LPPC, its implications, and why it constitutes a premature verdict that undermines the very principles of natural justice the legal profession is sworn to uphold.  Chief Mike Ozekhome, a prominent constitutional lawyer and human rights advocate, is currently facing disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee. The proceedings relate to his involvement in a controversial property dispute in the United Kingdom concerning a property located at 79 Randall Avenue, London. Chief Ozekhome is also standing trial before an FCT High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on a 12-count charge, to which he has pleaded not guilty.  What is particularly significant and troubling is that the same issues before the LPPC are also pending before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC), the body statutorily charged with the responsibility of sanctioning legal practitioners for professional misconduct. The LPDC is yet to make any determination on the substantive allegations against chief Ozekhome. Yet, the LPPC has proceeded to impose a suspension that, in practical effect, constitutes a pre-determinative sanction.  The Distinct Jurisdictions of the LPPC and LPDC  To appreciate the gravity of the LPPC’s decision, it is essential to understand the distinct and separate roles of the LPPC and the LPDC under Nigerian law.  The LPPC is a statutory body established under Section 5 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its primary function is to consider and determine eligible applicants for the conferment of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. Chaired by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the LPPC is also empowered to make rules as to the privileges to be accorded to Senior Advocates of Nigeria. While the LPPC has disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers are ancillary to its primary function of conferring and regulating the rank. The LPPC's disciplinary authority is derived from its guidelines, including Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. However, this authority is limited to matters pertaining to the rank itself and the privileges associated with it.  The LPDC, by contrast, is a committee of the Body of Benchers established under Section 10 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its mandate is far broader and more fundamental: it is the primary disciplinary body for all legal practitioners in Nigeria. The LPDC exercises jurisdiction over all lawyers called to the Nigerian Bar and is empowered to investigate allegations of professional misconduct and impose sanctions ranging from admonition to suspension and disbarment.  The Critical Distinction  The distinction between these two bodies is not merely academic, it is fundamental to the proper administration of justice in the legal profession. The LPPC is primarily a conferring and privilege-regulating body. The LPDC is the disciplinary body par excellence. While the LPPC may have incidental disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers cannot supplant or pre-empt the primary disciplinary jurisdiction of the LPDC.  When the same issues are pending before both bodies, as they are in chief Ozekhome’s case, the LPDC’s determination on professional misconduct must logically precede any disciplinary sanction from the LPPC. The LPPC cannot independently determine facts of professional misconduct that are the exclusive province of the LPDC.  The Hasty Decision: A Premature Verdict  The LPPC’s decision to suspend chief Ozekhome from the rank of SAN pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings is, with respect, a hasty and premature verdict that suffers from several fundamental flaws.  Procedural Impropriety ...

Read moreDetails
TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

June 26, 2026
Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

June 25, 2026
Charge or Release El-Rufai now Group charges FG, calls on opposition leaders to speak out

ICPC arraigns el-Rufai, ex-aide over alleged N8.68bn CCTV contract fraud in Kaduna

June 25, 2026
Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

June 25, 2026
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepage

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng