Saturday, June 27, 2026
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
Advertisement
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
No Result
View All Result
Home News

IPOB raises the alarm over claimed plot to assassinate British High Commissioner in South-East 

Maurice Okosisi by Maurice Okosisi
July 14, 2022
in News
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

*The group is talking rubbish, presidency source says

The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) have raised alarm of a plot by “enemies of Biafra” to assassinate the British High Commissioner, Catriona Laing, in the South East Region and blame it on the group.

They therefore advised the High Commissioner “to be more conscious of her environment” and “to shelve her regular visits to different parts of the Nigeria country-side especially the Biafraland otherwise referred to as South East.”

IPOB, in a statement by its Spokesperson, Emma Powerful, said “the reason for this sincere security advise is to save her life. Despite her hatred for Biafra and Igbos in particular we have optimal respect and value for sanctity of life, especially visitors to our land. 

But sources in the presidency dismissed the claim, saying that the group always speaks “unsubstantiated rubbish and spews unfounded allegations”.

The source, who pleaded for anonymity because he was not authorised to speak, said it is a shame that a group which has been branded as a terrisist organisation should be using propaganda to cury favour.

“But we want to tell them that delving into such a dangerous area by brining in a diplomat into their devilish agenda proves how terrible their minds work.

I” their own interest, they should desist from causing confusion and stoking divisive tendencies which the hallmark of their process. But, this will not work. We can o ly wish them what they wish other people,” the source said.

But, Powerful had stated: “In view of the recently intercepted Intel by our M-Branch the IPOB Intelligence Unit Department, there’s an orchestrated conspiracy to perform a sacrifice big and powerful enough to strengthen the potency of the British hatred against the Igbos and Biafra. Such high profile plan is zeroed towards using a highly placed person capable of making a headline news globally as an scapegoat. 

“The leadership of IPOB do hereby advise that Ms Catriona Liang must as a matter of life and death suspend all her planned activities involving travels within Biafran Territories. 

“Those that are threatened by Biafra restoration project has perfected evil plans to assassinate Ms. Catriona Liang, the British Envoy on Biafra soil as a quick and cogent reason for Britain to disengage their weapons supplies to Ukraine and concentrate same towards Nigeria to be used against Biafrans. 

“Their aim is to quash the agitation for Self Determination and to kill as many Indigenous Biafrans as possible and other residents in Biafra land.

“We want to make it unequivocally clear to the International Community that IPOB is a non-violent Self Determination movement and we understand the usefulness of diplomacy and we respect diplomatic relations. 

“In spite of Nigeria government’s unprovoked attacks, arrest, torture,  illegal detentions, rape, killings and forceful disaperance of our family members especially oue youth, IPOB has not changed our peaceful non-violent agitation into armed struggle.  

“IPOB does not wish the British Envoy death or dead, however if she ignores this  advise and walk into the trap already set by enemies of Biafra struggle, that will be considered suicidal. 

“We also want to let those masterminding the assassination plot of a British Envoy on Biafran soil to understand that nothing and I mean absolutely nothing will slow down let alone halt the Biafra restoration project.  

“We therefore, advise the British Envoy never to loose your guard even while we’ve successfully bursted their plan.

“It is worthy to note that we had never attacked British persons, citizens, Institutions, investments and properties of any kind, and we do not have such intention now or in the future  notwithstanding being at the receiving end of the British unpleasant attitudes, Igbophobic, Biafraphobic and stringent policies.

“Garba Shehu and Co-cabals hatched the plan to tarnish the image of ESN and IPOB and they decided to replicate what they did with the murder of the two Nigeria Army couples who were murdered last April.

We call on Garuba Shehu, the Aso Rock theatre art Director to choose another location, procure another format as those intercepted would never be released. 

“The British woman called Catriona Laing, the British High Commissioner to Nigeria is not our problem, if Nigeria Presidency have ran out of ideas on how to stop Biafra agitation why not try  Referendum?

“The UK Government must understand that IPOB’s grudges against them has not reached to the extent that warrants assassination of their citizens in Biafraland, in Nigeria or in any other part of the World for that matter. 

“Whosoever plans to invite Catriona Liang to Biafraland must provide adequate security enough to protect her and counter that which was planned in Aso-Rock in a meeting concluded on the 11.07.2022; 21:35hrs in Abuja.”

Previous Post

Osun: Court clears Oyetola for Osun guber

Next Post

Fears as terrorists increase presence at Karshi Hills 

Next Post

Fears as terrorists increase presence at Karshi Hills 

https://youtu.be/FHyJ1Wr0FAk?si=0WVYI_2OR4OrIrQ4
https://youtu.be/gbE3azm_Io0?si=GdE3Mqelo1ujTNla
Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  
Opinion

Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  

by Newsdesk Africa
June 26, 2026
0

By Sheriff. C. ADELE, Esq  On June 23, 2026, the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC), at its 173rd General Meeting, approved the suspension of Chief Mike Ozekhome from the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). The suspension, announced pursuant to Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria, is to remain in force pending the final determination of disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee.   While the LPPC asserts that the suspension is intended to "safeguard the integrity, dignity and prestige of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria", this decision raises profound concerns about procedural propriety, jurisdictional overreach, and the prejudicial effect it portends for both the legal profession and the administration of justice. This article critically examines the hasty decision of the LPPC, its implications, and why it constitutes a premature verdict that undermines the very principles of natural justice the legal profession is sworn to uphold.  Chief Mike Ozekhome, a prominent constitutional lawyer and human rights advocate, is currently facing disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee. The proceedings relate to his involvement in a controversial property dispute in the United Kingdom concerning a property located at 79 Randall Avenue, London. Chief Ozekhome is also standing trial before an FCT High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on a 12-count charge, to which he has pleaded not guilty.  What is particularly significant and troubling is that the same issues before the LPPC are also pending before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC), the body statutorily charged with the responsibility of sanctioning legal practitioners for professional misconduct. The LPDC is yet to make any determination on the substantive allegations against chief Ozekhome. Yet, the LPPC has proceeded to impose a suspension that, in practical effect, constitutes a pre-determinative sanction.  The Distinct Jurisdictions of the LPPC and LPDC  To appreciate the gravity of the LPPC’s decision, it is essential to understand the distinct and separate roles of the LPPC and the LPDC under Nigerian law.  The LPPC is a statutory body established under Section 5 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its primary function is to consider and determine eligible applicants for the conferment of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. Chaired by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the LPPC is also empowered to make rules as to the privileges to be accorded to Senior Advocates of Nigeria. While the LPPC has disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers are ancillary to its primary function of conferring and regulating the rank. The LPPC's disciplinary authority is derived from its guidelines, including Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. However, this authority is limited to matters pertaining to the rank itself and the privileges associated with it.  The LPDC, by contrast, is a committee of the Body of Benchers established under Section 10 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its mandate is far broader and more fundamental: it is the primary disciplinary body for all legal practitioners in Nigeria. The LPDC exercises jurisdiction over all lawyers called to the Nigerian Bar and is empowered to investigate allegations of professional misconduct and impose sanctions ranging from admonition to suspension and disbarment.  The Critical Distinction  The distinction between these two bodies is not merely academic, it is fundamental to the proper administration of justice in the legal profession. The LPPC is primarily a conferring and privilege-regulating body. The LPDC is the disciplinary body par excellence. While the LPPC may have incidental disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers cannot supplant or pre-empt the primary disciplinary jurisdiction of the LPDC.  When the same issues are pending before both bodies, as they are in chief Ozekhome’s case, the LPDC’s determination on professional misconduct must logically precede any disciplinary sanction from the LPPC. The LPPC cannot independently determine facts of professional misconduct that are the exclusive province of the LPDC.  The Hasty Decision: A Premature Verdict  The LPPC’s decision to suspend chief Ozekhome from the rank of SAN pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings is, with respect, a hasty and premature verdict that suffers from several fundamental flaws.  Procedural Impropriety ...

Read moreDetails
TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

June 26, 2026
Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

June 25, 2026
Charge or Release El-Rufai now Group charges FG, calls on opposition leaders to speak out

ICPC arraigns el-Rufai, ex-aide over alleged N8.68bn CCTV contract fraud in Kaduna

June 25, 2026
Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

June 25, 2026
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepage

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng