Friday, June 26, 2026
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
Advertisement
  • Cover
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Editorial
  • Interview
No Result
View All Result
Newsdesk Africa
No Result
View All Result
Home Cover

Hajj: Despite extension, hope dims for 8,000 Nigerian pilgrims

Hassan Tanko by Hassan Tanko
July 5, 2022
in Cover
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

 

*As Saudi airports close in 24 hours

Despite the extension of landing permits granted to Nigeria by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, there is still uncertainty over the fate of more than 8,000 intending pilgrims as they await their airlift just 24 hours to the closure of airports in Saudi Arabia.

The National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON) had announced on Monday that Saudi Arabia had granted a 48-hour extension to Nigeria to airlift all its intending pilgrims.

With the extension, the landing permit for flights conveying intending pilgrims, which was to close yesterday (Monday) would now close on Wednesday.

While this came as a relief to many intending pilgrims stranded across the country, there is still apprehension among some of the pilgrims as the deadline inches nearer.

Checks by our correspondent yesterday showed that as of Monday morning, 27,359 pilgrims have been airlifted out of the 33,971 State pilgrims while about 5,641 intending pilgrims are yet to be airlifted.

This is in addition to over 2,550 intending pilgrims belonging to the tour operators that are projected to miss the pilgrimage over the non-remittance of the funds belonging to the operators to the service providers in Saudi Arabia.

The funds would have enabled them to pay for visa processing, accommodation and feeding, among others.

While NAHCON said it has transferred the money to the operators’ accounts in Saudi Arabia, a number of the operators, about 51 of them, could not confirm the payment. Each tour operator had 50 pilgrims each allocated to them by NAHCON.

Daily Trust gathered that some of the operators had to source dollars from the black market to fund their accounts in Saudi Arabia in order to process their pilgrims.

But one of the affected tour operators who spoke with our correspondent on the condition of anonymity said he had already notified his pilgrims that they would miss the Hajj this year.

“I have already informed my intending pilgrims that I won’t be going for Hajj this year. This matter is beyond us. Up till Chairman, National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON), Alhaji Zikrullah Hassan now, there is no solution and about 2,800 would not be able to perform Hajj. In addition, we are running into serious debt with the flight bookings we have done.”

National President of the Association of Hajj and Umrah Operators of Nigeria (AHUON), Alhaji Nasidi Yahaya said, “We have not resolved a lot of issues as I am talking to you. Of course, a lot of our pilgrims will miss the exercise. Although they said they have arranged for rescue flights.

We are waiting to see it happen.

“But all the same, it has never been the usual thing. Some tour operators tried to source money from the parallel market, which is too bad to put into their banks so that they would not fail people.

This is terrible; we have never seen a thing like this before.”

But as the tour operators are confronted with the reality of their pilgrims missing the hajj exercise, thousands of State pilgrims are in limbo over the date of their departure to the holy land despite the extension.

Excessive flight cancellations, delays trigger confusion NAHCON through its Assistant Director, Public Affairs, Fatima Sanda Usara, disclosed in a statement that the General Authority for Civil Aviation (GACA) approved the extension of landing permit for Nigerian hajj carriers, saying the extension started from July 6 for one of the airlines and 4th and 5th have been approved for others.

Daily Trust reports FlyNas, Max Air and Azman Air are responsible for airlifting Nigerian pilgrims to Saudi Arabia.

NAHCON sought the extension to enable it to transport its remaining pilgrims into the Kingdom for the 2022 hajj.  

Usara disclosed that of the 43,008 pilgrims expected to arrive in Saudi Arabia from Nigeria, 27,359, inclusive of 527 staff as well as committees and board members, under the government quota have been conveyed. 

Similarly, over 5,000 out of the 8,097 tour operators’ pilgrims with valid visas were moved through scheduled flights and other arrangements.

She said the extension was necessitated by excessive flight cancellations and flight delays, saying, “Data has shown that, from 10th to 13th of June, nine flights were cancelled due to reasons ranging from inability to secure BTA, insufficient funds for visas, unavailable PCR test results, etc. 

“In total, 13 flights were cancelled with another 57 delayed take-offs. Seven of which are in two digits, with the highest being 24 hours’ delay, followed by 23 hours delay, 22 hours and lowest in this category are twice 10-hour delays. Only 13 flights left on schedule out of the 65 outbound flights so far witnessed from the country.”

NAHCON, however, assured that despite the “difficult situation”, no pilgrim would be left behind “as long as that individual has valid travel documents.” 

“To buttress this fact, frequency of outbound flights improved to seven take-offs yesterday and at full capacity too. Thankfully, one of the carriers, FlyNas, with its four aircraft, will fly four times daily thereby moving 1,732 each day,” the airline added. 

NAHCON, therefore, appealed to pilgrims “To be calm and to remain prepared for onward conveyance for the 2022 Hajj.” 

While regretting the tension and stress intending pilgrims might have experienced during this outbound journey to the holy land, the statement quoted the NAHCON’s Chairman, Alhaji Zikrullah Kunle Hassan as commending Nigerian pilgrim’s resilience while praying that they all attain Hajj Mabrur whose reward is Jannat ul Firdaus.

Doubts despite assurances

Despite the assurance, there is still uncertainty in the air as about 8,000 pilgrims are yet to be airlifted 24 hours before the deadline. 

For instance, in Kano, which has the highest number of pilgrims, there are at least 1,254 intending pilgrims that are yet to be airlifted.

So far, 975 intending pilgrims have departed the state for the holy land with the third flight leaving the Aminu Kano International Airport Sunday night.

The state was initially given 2,229 slots before the National Hajj Commission of Nigeria added 58 slots for Jaiz Hajj Scheme beneficiaries.

Daily Trust however gathered from the Kano State Pilgrims Welfare Board that pilgrims from 14 out of 44 LGAs had been airlifted with the state hoping to airlift the remaining 1254 before Tuesday. 

The Executive Secretary of Kano State Pilgrims Welfare Board, Alhaji Mohammad Abba Danbatta attributed the slow pace of the airlift of Kano pilgrims to Saudi Arabia to the incapability of the air carrier, Azman Air, assigned by NAHCON to airlift the pilgrims.

Danbatta, who stated this while addressing journalists in Kano on Monday, said before the commencement of the airlift of pilgrims to Saudi Arabia, the board had formally written to NAHCON seeking its approval to allow Max Air to airlift its pilgrims as against Azman Air that was allocated to the state.

He said the board made the request because Max Air had performed the same exercise for many years without any hindrance.

But despite its request, NAHCON assigned Azman Air, which is relatively new in the business, the task of airlifting its over 2000 intending pilgrims.

“Yesterday (Sunday), Azman directed us to call our pilgrims for airlift to Saudi Arabia, we summoned over 400 pilgrims for screening at the camp, and the pilgrims were left stranded for over 24 hours,” Dambatta lamented, adding that after NAHCON was intimated of the latest development, it agreed that Azman Air cannot fulfill the assignment and resolved to hire an air carrier company from Saudi Arabia named FlyNAS, with two aircraft that can contain over 400 pilgrims each at a time.

On his part, the Public Relations Officer of Azman Air, Nuruddeen Mohammad said they were directed by NAHCON to concentrate on the airlift of Kaduna pilgrims, saying they will collaborate with another airline to airlift all Kano pilgrims within the stipulated time.

A hajj stakeholder who spoke to our correspondent on the condition of anonymity stated that there is no magic that can be performed to meet up with the airlift of all the remaining pilgrims. 

“Even despite the extension, there is no way we can meet up the target even if we are airlifting 1,000 every day. We just have to accept the reality that some of our pilgrims would miss this year’s exercise. 

“They granted us an extension but I foresee that with that extension, we should be seeing some flight updates but nothing is happening. By tomorrow (today), the extension will remain 24 hours. This is a reality we have to face, we just pray that those who would not be able to make it will just see it as an act of God and pray against next year.”

Another hajj stakeholder, Abdulfattah Abdussalam, said NAHCON should have activated extra flights to fly pilgrims out before it is too late.

When contacted, the NAHCON’s spokesperson in a response to our correspondent’s enquiry if all the pilgrims would be airlifted before July 6, simply said, “In Sha Allah” (God’s willing).

Also, Executive Director of Max Air, Barr. Shehu Wadda assured that the airline would do its best to airlift all the pilgrims assigned to it.

He said, “By the grace of Almighty Allah, we will do our best. It is the way we started, they (pilgrims) were not coming out and there were a lot of logistics issues. This year’s Hajj is a special one but we are putting our efforts into it.”

Previous Post

139 clerics, worshipers killed, 394 kidnapped in 18 months – Reports

Next Post

FCTA policy on closure of parks in Abuja from 7pm is unconstitutional, sadistic and should be resisted

Next Post

FCTA policy on closure of parks in Abuja from 7pm is unconstitutional, sadistic and should be resisted

https://youtu.be/FHyJ1Wr0FAk?si=0WVYI_2OR4OrIrQ4
https://youtu.be/gbE3azm_Io0?si=GdE3Mqelo1ujTNla
Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  
Opinion

Suspension of Mike Ozekhome SAN: A Hasty Decision By The LPPC And The Prejudicial Effect Of Same  

by Newsdesk Africa
June 26, 2026
0

By Sheriff. C. ADELE, Esq  On June 23, 2026, the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC), at its 173rd General Meeting, approved the suspension of Chief Mike Ozekhome from the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). The suspension, announced pursuant to Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria, is to remain in force pending the final determination of disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee.   While the LPPC asserts that the suspension is intended to "safeguard the integrity, dignity and prestige of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria", this decision raises profound concerns about procedural propriety, jurisdictional overreach, and the prejudicial effect it portends for both the legal profession and the administration of justice. This article critically examines the hasty decision of the LPPC, its implications, and why it constitutes a premature verdict that undermines the very principles of natural justice the legal profession is sworn to uphold.  Chief Mike Ozekhome, a prominent constitutional lawyer and human rights advocate, is currently facing disciplinary proceedings before the LPPC’s Disciplinary and Ethics Sub-Committee. The proceedings relate to his involvement in a controversial property dispute in the United Kingdom concerning a property located at 79 Randall Avenue, London. Chief Ozekhome is also standing trial before an FCT High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on a 12-count charge, to which he has pleaded not guilty.  What is particularly significant and troubling is that the same issues before the LPPC are also pending before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC), the body statutorily charged with the responsibility of sanctioning legal practitioners for professional misconduct. The LPDC is yet to make any determination on the substantive allegations against chief Ozekhome. Yet, the LPPC has proceeded to impose a suspension that, in practical effect, constitutes a pre-determinative sanction.  The Distinct Jurisdictions of the LPPC and LPDC  To appreciate the gravity of the LPPC’s decision, it is essential to understand the distinct and separate roles of the LPPC and the LPDC under Nigerian law.  The LPPC is a statutory body established under Section 5 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its primary function is to consider and determine eligible applicants for the conferment of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. Chaired by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the LPPC is also empowered to make rules as to the privileges to be accorded to Senior Advocates of Nigeria. While the LPPC has disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers are ancillary to its primary function of conferring and regulating the rank. The LPPC's disciplinary authority is derived from its guidelines, including Paragraph 26(6) of the Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. However, this authority is limited to matters pertaining to the rank itself and the privileges associated with it.  The LPDC, by contrast, is a committee of the Body of Benchers established under Section 10 of the Legal Practitioners Act. Its mandate is far broader and more fundamental: it is the primary disciplinary body for all legal practitioners in Nigeria. The LPDC exercises jurisdiction over all lawyers called to the Nigerian Bar and is empowered to investigate allegations of professional misconduct and impose sanctions ranging from admonition to suspension and disbarment.  The Critical Distinction  The distinction between these two bodies is not merely academic, it is fundamental to the proper administration of justice in the legal profession. The LPPC is primarily a conferring and privilege-regulating body. The LPDC is the disciplinary body par excellence. While the LPPC may have incidental disciplinary powers over SAN holders, these powers cannot supplant or pre-empt the primary disciplinary jurisdiction of the LPDC.  When the same issues are pending before both bodies, as they are in chief Ozekhome’s case, the LPDC’s determination on professional misconduct must logically precede any disciplinary sanction from the LPPC. The LPPC cannot independently determine facts of professional misconduct that are the exclusive province of the LPDC.  The Hasty Decision: A Premature Verdict  The LPPC’s decision to suspend chief Ozekhome from the rank of SAN pending the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings is, with respect, a hasty and premature verdict that suffers from several fundamental flaws.  Procedural Impropriety ...

Read moreDetails
TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

TCN Restores Benin–Egbin Transmission Line, Targets Full Lagos Bulk Power Recovery

June 26, 2026
Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

Zulum closes Borno’s largest IDP camp in Bama, says Gwoza follows

June 25, 2026
Charge or Release El-Rufai now Group charges FG, calls on opposition leaders to speak out

ICPC arraigns el-Rufai, ex-aide over alleged N8.68bn CCTV contract fraud in Kaduna

June 25, 2026
Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

Education minister queries FUTO VC over appointment of 24 aides

June 25, 2026
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepage

Copyright© 2022-2025 Newsdesk Africa Published by Glossy Affairs Ltd. Tel: +2348152359152. Email: info@newsdeskafrica.com.ng editor@newsdeskafrica.com.ng